Political football games with transportation money is destructive to Inland Empire mobility.
As communities around California seek to reinvent their streets to be
more multimodal this will be an additional challenge that must be
addressed. Millions in dedicated funds for a proposed transit center in
Downtown Riverside was locally
de-obligated and assigned elsewhere, upsetting local bus riders. At
their November 13, 2012 meeting, the Riverside City Council voted in a
6-1 majority to
reaffirm its commitment toward building a multi-modal transit center
on Vine Street near the downtown Metrolink station. The City agreed to
work with the Riverside Transit Agency to work out differences over the
project; however, some
of those "differences" combined with federal deadlines and regulations
came with a disastrous price tag for the Riverside riding public.
RTA had secured approximately $7 million toward this project from various public sources; the federal funding portion however was strapped with spending deadlines. Because officials failed to see how moving the existing transit hub several blocks east to Vine Street would affect the connecting bus routes, RTA decided in September to shelve the Vine Street location and instead spend $4.5 million of the transit center's funds to redevelop the existing Downtown Terminal station. The city and the local business community then expressed concerns about that plan, thus more fuel was dumped on the political fire.
Even though the City of Riverside can commit the Riverside Transit Center project to any public site it pleases, RTA has fiduciary responsibility over the project's funds, not the city. What the city can and should do instead is designate the Metrolink station block as a specific plan and offer local property tax incentives and rebates so that private developers and entrepreneurs can invest and build the transit center combined with a much-needed free market job site. This win-win funding concept has yet to be adopted.
With the Riverside Transit Center mired in public financial regulations and deadlines, RTA changed course and emptied the project's fund. At their October 2012 Board of Directors meeting, RTA redirected nearly all of the Riverside Transit Center's project funds toward the Twin Cities Transit Center in the Temecula/Murrieta area.
From the perspective of the riding public, this is a complete disgrace
to Inland Empire mobility. Multi-modal connectivity between the downtown
core, local buses and trains at the Riverside Downtown Metrolink
station is very limited. That
is very clear. To be fair, the Twin Cities Transit Center down south
promises to address a growing region in the Inland Empire and
coordinating the project with future high-speed rail is finally in
the talks. But what is disappointing to the Riverside public is the lack
of cooperation between local and federal officials to get the worthy
Vine Street Transit Center
built with the $7 million in funds already collected,
among other issues (Page 5).
$7 million is more than enough to start up a first phase of the project by adding additional bus stops along the existing streets and moving the hub and bus routes over. The truth is the project was so strapped with rules and regulations that such a logical and cost-effective move wouldn't likely work on a sheet of legal paper, but work fine out in the real world. These political roadblocks must be reformed. Unnecessary federal regulations and political football games with transportation money only delays worthwhile projects, adds layers of cost, and is destructive to Inland Empire mobility. It will be continually confronted by The Transit Coalition
The Riverside City Council also indicated that RTA was potentially moving to a grid-based bus system based on a post on the Riding in Riverside Transit Blog. It's far too early to determine what proposals are in store, but Riverside County's street layout and demographics make a countywide grid-based bus system absolutely illogical. We all remember in 2000 OCTA's ill-advised Point-to-Point grid system that negated ridership systemwide. That colossal blunder led OCTA to alter several of its routes back to a hybrid grid and hub-and-spoke model. RTA's current system operates smartly on this hybrid system: The majority of routes connect at a major hub, fan out over the region, and emulate the grid system with direct service via major streets before rejoining again at the next hub. Aside from some changes outlined in The Transit Coalition's Future Vision, RTA should maintain its current route model.
As communities around California seek to reinvent their streets to be
more multimodal this will be an additional challenge that must be
addressed. Millions in dedicated funds for a proposed transit center in
Downtown Riverside was locally
de-obligated and assigned elsewhere, upsetting local bus riders. At
their November 13, 2012 meeting, the Riverside City Council voted in a
6-1 majority to
reaffirm its commitment toward building a multi-modal transit center
on Vine Street near the downtown Metrolink station. The City agreed to
work with the Riverside Transit Agency to work out differences over the
project; however, some
of those "differences" combined with federal deadlines and regulations
came with a disastrous price tag for the Riverside riding public.
RTA had secured approximately $7 million toward this project from various public sources; the federal funding portion however was strapped with spending deadlines. Because officials failed to see how moving the existing transit hub several blocks east to Vine Street would affect the connecting bus routes, RTA decided in September to shelve the Vine Street location and instead spend $4.5 million of the transit center's funds to redevelop the existing Downtown Terminal station. The city and the local business community then expressed concerns about that plan, thus more fuel was dumped on the political fire.
Even though the City of Riverside can commit the Riverside Transit Center project to any public site it pleases, RTA has fiduciary responsibility over the project's funds, not the city. What the city can and should do instead is designate the Metrolink station block as a specific plan and offer local property tax incentives and rebates so that private developers and entrepreneurs can invest and build the transit center combined with a much-needed free market job site. This win-win funding concept has yet to be adopted.
With the Riverside Transit Center mired in public financial regulations and deadlines, RTA changed course and emptied the project's fund. At their October 2012 Board of Directors meeting, RTA redirected nearly all of the Riverside Transit Center's project funds toward the Twin Cities Transit Center in the Temecula/Murrieta area.
From the perspective of the riding public, this is a complete disgrace
to Inland Empire mobility. Multi-modal connectivity between the downtown
core, local buses and trains at the Riverside Downtown Metrolink
station is very limited. That
is very clear. To be fair, the Twin Cities Transit Center down south
promises to address a growing region in the Inland Empire and
coordinating the project with future high-speed rail is finally in
the talks. But what is disappointing to the Riverside public is the lack
of cooperation between local and federal officials to get the worthy
Vine Street Transit Center
built with the $7 million in funds already collected,
among other issues (Page 5).
$7 million is more than enough to start up a first phase of the project by adding additional bus stops along the existing streets and moving the hub and bus routes over. The truth is the project was so strapped with rules and regulations that such a logical and cost-effective move wouldn't likely work on a sheet of legal paper, but work fine out in the real world. These political roadblocks must be reformed. Unnecessary federal regulations and political football games with transportation money only delays worthwhile projects, adds layers of cost, and is destructive to Inland Empire mobility. It will be continually confronted by The Transit Coalition
The Riverside City Council also indicated that RTA was potentially moving to a grid-based bus system based on a post on the Riding in Riverside Transit Blog. It's far too early to determine what proposals are in store, but Riverside County's street layout and demographics make a countywide grid-based bus system absolutely illogical. We all remember in 2000 OCTA's ill-advised Point-to-Point grid system that negated ridership systemwide. That colossal blunder led OCTA to alter several of its routes back to a hybrid grid and hub-and-spoke model. RTA's current system operates smartly on this hybrid system: The majority of routes connect at a major hub, fan out over the region, and emulate the grid system with direct service via major streets before rejoining again at the next hub. Aside from some changes outlined in The Transit Coalition's Future Vision, RTA should maintain its current route model.
Comments
Post a Comment