Transit and highway infrastructure must
be upgraded if this development is to prosper—no question. The
existing infrastructure near the I-15 freeway corridor simply cannot
sustain current demands let alone the additional vehicles generated
by the development proposed. Try heading into or leaving Temecula
during the afternoon peak hour at 5 pm. Ask the locals just how bad
traffic can get near the I-15 freeway. Earlier this month, a large
event in the region caused a local Temecula freeway off ramp queue to
back up into the main freeway lanes, causing a chain reaction
that slowed traffic for five miles. We don't want Temecula to become the next Corona Crawl.
To be fair, both Temecula and its
neighbor Murrieta have been proactive in getting infrastructure built
and plans are moving
forward with a local interchange project which involves shutting
down a major off ramp in the area next weekend.
However, much more needs to be done in
order to get the region's transportation network into stability and
the state needs to be held accountable for getting this done. On top
of what is locally proposed, Temecula is going to need several more
amenities in order to sustain the continued growth demand: Dual high occupancy lanes in
each direction along the I-15 between Corona and Escondido which support free non-transponder carpooling, direct
access ramps between the HOV/HOT lanes and transit hubs, additional
north/south connectors between Temecula and Murrieta, an extension of
the Metrolink Perris Valley Line into the region, a BRT line between the Pechanga
Resort and Lake Elsinore, hourly all-day intercity bus service offered by the
private sector between LA and San Diego, and a more direct hub-and-spoke local bus network.
All this will not be possible unless the state stops displacing
transportation funds and gas tax revenue to other special interest
programs.
Comments
Post a Comment