(2/4/13)
– IE Transit Talking Points Short
The
Metrolink Perris Valley Line extension, now mired in an environmental
lawsuit, is about to have its fate decided by Superior Court Judge
Sharon Waters according to the Press Enterprise which is very
embarrassing for the state government.
It is a scientific fact that mass transit options for the I-215 corridor will benefit the environment and highways, not negate them. The opposing party has a number of arguments against the Metrolink extension which appear frivolous and very puritanical on the surface, but has enough merit to warrant a trial due to loopholes in the California Environmental Quality Act.
It is a scientific fact that mass transit options for the I-215 corridor will benefit the environment and highways, not negate them. The opposing party has a number of arguments against the Metrolink extension which appear frivolous and very puritanical on the surface, but has enough merit to warrant a trial due to loopholes in the California Environmental Quality Act.
Among the claims, the group Friends of
Riverside’s Hills said the environmental impact report inadequately
explains the number of truck trips needed to remove soil. Other issues brought up were the schedule for excavating the dirt, the removal of an illegal trail crossing
over the right-of-way, the squealing noise train wheels make when
taking sharp turns, engine noises, and other
construction-related noise. Because of those claims, Judge Waters can
unilaterally decide that the Perris Valley Line failed to follow the
California Environmental Quality Act, even though the I-215 rail
transit alternative will actually benefit the environment.
Truth
be told: Mass transit is good for the environment and the Perris Valley
Line’s fate must not be vetoed by a judge; that’s legislating
from the bench. The state legislature needs to amend the California
Environmental Quality Act, close up its loopholes, and make it
retroactive to any environmentally- friendly transportation project
stalled in court. Riverside County taxpayers should not be on the
hook if a construction contractor carelessly generates too much dust
pollution, noise or truck traffic. Penalize the contractor with a heavy fine if its
employees break CEQA laws, but don’t hold overdue transportation projects hostage. Doing nothing is a recipe for increased traffic congestion and worsened smog pollution.
Yeah yeah yet another group of people with nothing better to do but stand in the way of progress. I am all for LEGITIMATE ecological concerns, however not for things that are thought up while sitting on the throne taking a dump.
ReplyDelete